Behind Your Outlet

a lighter take on electricity topics from NPPD employees

  • About
  • Blog

Connect

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
NPPD

Standing With Public Power

June 16, 2014 By Rick Nelson

guest post
 

Man standing on a soap box

It’s funny how over time things kind of repeat themselves. We had a customer bring me the Rural Electric Nebraskan from April1972. It was fun to look back at the topics of the articles and to see what “Custer Public Power” was talking about in the insert, when I noticed an editorial page with the title of “Spirit of Nebraska.”

The editor of the magazine wanted to “get up on his soapbox.” So I continued reading wondering what was important in 1972. He, Robert Anderson, editor, was having a conversation with somebody from Omaha about public power. His friend was talking about doing away with public power and the rural electric system. The argument was that public power was being subsidized by the Government, and it should be sold to private companies who are more efficient. I’m sure there were more arguments than that in the conversation, but I’m going off his editorial and those were the ones mentioned.

Therefore, after hearing enough of his friend’s arguments, that’s when Anderson found his soap box. He listed 10 facts about rural electric systems; most of which are still applicable today. I’ll cite just a few. Rural electric systems cover over 75 percent of the land mass in the U.S. By policy, every rural power district must serve its entire rural area – everyone.

The average rural residential customer now uses about 1,000 kilowatt-hours per month compared to 695 kilowatt-hours in 1972 and 357 kilowatt-hours in 1960.

As I ponder public power existence, I also have to throw into the mix that our governing boards are elected locally. We are in business to reliably serve our customers and any margins (dollars) we have go back in to upkeep and building the electric system to serve those customers, not to shareholders. We are required by state statute to serve our customers reliably and at the lowest cost possible.

I feel compelled to end with the editor’s closing paragraph: “Undoubtedly, you also have run into these ‘types’ of zealous friends. Take a tip from me – don’t lose your soap box. Take it along and tell it like it is. Nebraska’s rural electric systems don’t need any apologies. They are the best approach yet to bringing the lowest possible priced electrical power to Nebraska’s rural areas, utilizing sound business principles.”

Just like it was some 40 years ago, there are people who think that public power is not efficient or stands in the way of progress. This is absolutely not the case. I say good for you Robert for standing up for public power. Now you’re going to see me stand up on my soapbox a little more often as well.

Filed Under: Guest Post, Public Power

Subscribe

Sign up to receive email updates when new posts are added.

Rick Nelson

About Rick Nelson

Rick is the General Manager at Custer Public Power District. As Nebraska's largest rural public power district in terms of geography, Custer's service territory encompasses more than 8,000 square miles in north central Nebraska.

Comments

  1. Alan Dostal says

    June 17, 2014 at 10:30 pm

    Rick, great job. I think it is important every now and then and look where public power has come from. I think our history of service is just as important now as it will be in the future.

    Thanks for contributing to the blog.

    Alan Dostal

Recent

  • Write-men can’t jump
  • My Day – Thursday with Stacy
  • My Day – Tuesday with Karl
  • Thankful for Blankets
  • Cleaning Those Dirty Dishes

Our Topics

  • Education (4)
  • Electricity (10)
  • Energy Efficiency (7)
  • Guest Post (4)
  • My Day (9)
  • Nature (6)
  • Other (13)
  • Public Power (15)
  • Resource Mix (4)
  • Safety (11)
  • The District (31)

Archives

  • February 2017 (1)
  • January 2017 (1)
  • December 2016 (1)
  • November 2016 (2)
  • October 2016 (1)
  • September 2016 (1)
  • August 2016 (2)
  • July 2016 (1)
  • June 2016 (2)
  • May 2016 (1)
  • April 2016 (1)
  • March 2016 (1)
  • February 2016 (2)
  • January 2016 (3)
  • December 2015 (1)
  • November 2015 (3)
  • October 2015 (3)
  • September 2015 (5)
  • August 2015 (2)
  • July 2015 (4)
  • June 2015 (2)
  • May 2015 (1)
  • April 2015 (4)
  • March 2015 (2)
  • February 2015 (1)
  • December 2014 (2)
  • November 2014 (2)
  • October 2014 (4)
  • September 2014 (2)
  • August 2014 (1)
  • July 2014 (2)
  • June 2014 (1)
  • May 2014 (3)
  • April 2014 (3)
  • March 2014 (3)
  • February 2014 (3)
  • January 2014 (5)
  • December 2013 (1)

Find it here